¹Maria Cristina Lalaine M. Nerona,²Michelle G. Quijano

^1,2Isabela State University

The purpose of this study was to determine the research culture among faculty members of Isabela State University which was also the population of this research. Total Enumeration sampling was used to determine the respondents among the different programs. A five-point Likert Scale was used and the instruments was validated by experienced professors in the field. As to the profile, majority of the respondents are from the college of education with the age bracket of 26 to 30, female, permanent faculty and has been in the service for 5 years and below. Accordingly, most of them are instructor with master’s degree and doctoral units, and equivalent teaching units of above 24. The study also shows that 61.31% of the respondents presented their paper for the last five years in the international, national and local conferences and categorize as technical, technological, social and educational. Faculty rarely involve in research work and activities. The perceived level of competence in research writing for faculty is good based on the overall mean. The level of involvement of faculty researchers and its profile particularly in educational status and highest educational attainment has significant relationship using Chi Square as the statistical tool. As to the significant relationship of faculty involvement in research and extent of Organization Support to faculty researchers shows significant relationship this means that the Administration should fully support any research activities of faculty members.

Research Work, Quantitative, Perception, Social Research, Implementation.

1) Ariola, M. (2006). Principles and Methods of Research. Manila: Rex Book Store, Inc.

2) Creamer, D. G., & Winston, R. B. (2002b, September 12). Improving staffing practices: Part 2—supervision. NetResults. Retrieved November 27, 2002 from http://www.naspa.org/netresults

3) CSC MC 10, s. 2012: Education Requirement for faculty Positions in State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) and Local Colleges and Universities. Civil Service Guide: A Compilation of issuances on Commission on Higher Education. (2009). National higher education research Agenda - 2: NHERA 2; 2009-2018. Manila Philippines: CHED.

4) Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The ultimate faculty evaluation: Promotion and tenure decisions. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114, 97-108. doi:10.1002/ir.50

5) Harackiewicz, J. M., & Sansone, C. (2000). Rewarding competence: The importance of goals in the study of intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 79–103). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012619070-0/50026-X

6) Olsen, D. R. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge University Press.

7) Roger L. Geiger. To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900–1940. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

8) Zarah Weiss and Detmar Meurers. 2019. Analyzing Linguistic Complexity and Accuracy in Academic Language Development of German across Elementary and Secondary School.

9) In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, pages 380–393, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.

VOLUME 06 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2023

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.