• editor@ijmra.in
  • ISSN[Online] : 2643-9875  ||  ISSN[Print] : 2643-9840

Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024

Teaching For Engagement: A Practice to Foster Lessons in the Central Senatorial District of Cross River State, Nigeria
1Ewa, Gegbazi Moses, 2Abutiang,Peter Ukpanukpong
1,2Department of Primary Education, School of Early Childhood Care and Primary Education Cross River State College of Education, Akamkpa
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i12-34

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:

Teaching for engagement is an innovative strategy that places the learner at the fore of education. It is an approach which promotes active learning among children in primary schools. A multi-site case study was undertaken to explore the ways teachers conducted teaching for engagement to affect classroom lessons in three state primary schools located in Abi, Ikom and Boki Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Cross River State, Nigeria. Three (3) research questions were posed for the study. Six (6) teachers were selected from three primary schools across these LGAs for the study. Based on the social inclusion theory data was analyzed thematically. Findings were based on stated research questions and indicate that practitioner’s choice of instructional strategy and promotion of learner voice affect engagement at lesson; huge workload on teachers and poor knowledge of pedagogy hinder engagement. It was recommended that emphasis should be on learner-centredness during classroom instruction, and that competent teachers have to be recruited to work in primary schools within the context.

KEYWORDS:

teaching for engagement, teachers, teaching, participation, classroom lessons.

REFERENCES
1) Al Mandalawi, A. B. K. H. (2024). Innovative teaching methods enhancing engagement and learning outcomes. Al-Iraqa Foundation for Culture and Development, 3, pp. 1-33.

2) Asim, A. E., Idaka, I. E. & Eni, E. I. (2017). Research in education: concepts and Techniques. Bloann Educational Publishers.

3) Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, pp. 77-101.

4) Chapman, C., Laird, J., Ifill, N. & KewalRamani, A. (2010). Trends in high schools dropout and completion rates in the United States: 1972-2009 (NCES 2012- 006). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC. Accessed via http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.

5) Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

6) Creswell, J. W. (2009), Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method Approaches (3rd Ed.), Los Angeles: SAGE

7) Danda, U. N. & Abidin, L. N. (2012). Effect of instruction in metacognitive skills on Mathematics concepts achievement and test anxiety of low achieving students in junior secondary schools. Review of Education, 20(1), pp. 12–19.

8) Eccles, J. S. (2016). Engagement: Where to next? Learning and Instruction, 43, pp. 71- 75.

9) English, L. & Halford, G. (1995). Mathematics education models and processes. USA: Lawrence Earlbaum.

10) Ewa, M. A. (2019). Learner voice, praxis for democratic schooling in Nigeria. British Journal of Education, 7(4), pp. 84-97.

11) Exeter, D. J., Ameratunga, S., Ratima, M., Morton, S., Dickson, M., Hsu, M. & Jackson, R. (2010). Student’s engagement in very large classes: the teachers’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), pp. 761-775.

12) Federal Republic of Nigeria (2013). National policy on education (6th Ed.). Abuja: National Educational Research and Development Council, p. 7.

13) Fedricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C. & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74 (1), pp. 59-109.

14) Fielding, M. (2004a). Transformative approaches to student voice: theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), pp. 295-311.

15) Fielding, M. (2008) Interrogating student voice: pre-occupations, purposes and possibilities, critical perspectives in education. Summer 2008, p. 2.

16) Fielding, M. (2012). Beyond student voice: patterns of partnership and the demand of deep democracy. Revista de Educacion, 359, pp. 45-65.

17) Fredricks, J. A. (2015). Academic engagement. In Wright, J. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences, 2nd edition, 2, pp. 31–36. Oxford: Elsevier.

18) Gavala, J., & Flett, R. (2005). Influential factors moderating academic enjoyment/motivation and psychological well-being for Maori university students at Massey University. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34(1), pp. 52–57.

19) Heylighen, F. (1997). Epistemological constructivism. Accessed via http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/construc.html.

20) Johnson, D., Soldner, M., Leonard, J., Alvarez, P., Inkelas, K., Rowan-Kenyon, H. & Longerbeam, S. (2007). Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups. Journal of College Student Development, 48(5), pp. 525–542.

21) Liu, C. A. & Matthews, R. (2005). Vygotsky’s psychology: constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Educational Journal, 6(3), pp. 386-399.

22) Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

23) Ntibi, J. E .E., Neji, H. A. & Agube, C. (2020). Students’ Perception of Teacher Knowledge of Subject Matter/Lesson Presentation and Academic Performance in Physics in Calabar Municipality, Cross River State, Nigeria. European Journal of. Social Sciences, 59(2), pp 247-254.

24) Power, S., Rhys, M., Taylor, C. & Waldron, S. (2018). How child-centred education favours some learners more than others. Review of Education. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Publication.

25) Robson, C. (2005). Real world research: a resource for social scientist and practitioner-researchers (fourth edition). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. p. 63

26) Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. London: The Guilford Press.

27) Taylor, L. & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved August 28, 2016 via http://cie.asu.edu/

28) Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University. Retrieved 14 July, 2016 via https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview _1.pdf

29) United Nations Centre for Human Rights/UNICEF (1990). Convention on the rights of the Child: Briefing Kit (Geneva, UN Centre for Human Rights/UNICEF).

30) Vrasidas, C. (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: implications for interaction,course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunication, 6(4), p. 7.

31) Willms, J. D. (2003). Student engagement at school: a sense of belonging and participation. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

32) Wiske, M. S. (1998). Teaching for understanding: linking research with practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

33) Woodcock, M. (2013). Social inclusion: its significance for development theory, research and policy. Wold Bank and Harvard University. Paris: UNESCO.

34) World Bank (2013). Inclusion Matters: The Foundation for Shared Prosperity.Washington, DC: World Bank. ISBN 978-1-4648-0010-8.
Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024

There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.


Our Services and Policies

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.

The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.

Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 07 Issue 12 (December 2024).

PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 December 2024 .
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online

Why with us

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis is better then other journals because:-
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.

The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.

Indexed In
Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar